Why Sun should GPL StarOffice
All software should be free?
As most readers probably know already,Sun Microsystems recently purchased StarDivision, maker of StarOffice, a full-featured office suite that competes with (and is somewhat compatible with) Microsoft Office. Unlike Microsoft Office, however, StarOffice is cross-platform, and is available today for Windows, Linux, Solaris, and OS/2.
Sun has also announced its intention to allow access to theStarOffice source code, under the Sun Community Source License (SCSL). While some media have reported this as Sun "open sourcing" StarOffice, this is not accurate, since the SCSL does not comply with the Open Source Definition (OSD).
For those who already believe that all software should be free, the thing for Sun to do is obvious: release StarOffice under the terms of an OSD-compliant license, preferably the GNU General Public License (GPL). But those who are not free software purists, and especially those who are Sun stockholders, will ask "what's in it for Sun?" I outline here why I believe it is in the best interest of Sun Microsystems to release StarOffice as truly free software.
- 1Linux Top 3: Alpine Linux 3.4, deepin 15.2 and Linux Lite 3.0
- 2Linux 4.7 Set to Boost Live Patching, Security and Power Management
- 3Linux 4.6 Charred Weasel adds USB 3.1 Support
- 4Linux Top 3: OpenIndiana 2016.04, Ubuntu 16.04 and Debian's New Leader
- 5Linux Top 3: KaOS 2016.04, TurnKey 14.1 and pfSense 2.3