.comment: The Search for a Truly Great Keyboard
The Weak Link

Dennis E. Powell
Wednesday, February 7, 2001 09:32:02 AM
Computer makers, and makers of
computer upgrades, go to a lot of trouble to produce very high
quality monitors, some really nifty trackballs (which would be even
better if they'd bother to produce Linux-specific drivers; for
instance, my Kensington Expert Mouse would be a lot cooler if its
programmable buttons were programmable under Linux), and all sorts of
other wonderful stuff. But the area that's largely left behind is the
one most in need of attention, because it is the one thing with which
we all must deal: The keyboard.
And that's a shame. Keyboards are
probably replaced more frequently than any other piece of hardware.
They get full of all kinds of crud and corruption -- it takes a
strong stomach, sometimes, do disassemble and clean one of the things
-- and none is really happy for long if swimming in Coca Cola or
coffee. No, those keyboard condom things aren't the answer -- they
destroy the sensation. Face it: Keyboard replacement is something
that happens and is going to happen. And face, too, the fact that the
aftermarket keyboard supply is just terrible, unless you want to go
hunting in extraobvious places. The standard replacement keyboard at
local clone shops or computer stores is so flimsy that you can grab
each end and by applying just a little torsional force reduce it to
shards of flimsy plastic usually found elsewhere only in packaging
materials. (Yes, there are now weirdly-shaped keyboards, and
"Internet" keyboards; a few years ago there was a thing
that looked like a mouse or a flight simulator throttle quadrant that
had a few buttons, the idea being that by properly chording the
buttons you could do everything you could do with a regular keyboard.
All of these are [and were] relatively expensive, gimmicky, and in
the final analysis beside the point.)
In the early days, keyboards were
solid pieces of machinery. The original IBM-PC keyboard was a heavy
and serious thing, albeit with just 84 keys. I have one in the other
room, awaiting discovery of a cable that will attach it to a machine
that wants an AT keyboard. You can find IBM PC-ATs all over the
place, but one with its original keyboard will bring three times the
price, because they keyboards themselves are so good that people have
lovingly maintained them and have kept them when upgrading their
other hardware. The IBM mainframe keyboards were even better -- also
in the other room I have a huge and wonderful keyboard for an IBM
terminal. This thing has all kinds of special-purpose keys, each
sitting atop a switch that appears designed to survive nuclear
attack. This Mighty Wurlitzer of a keyboard, alas, has defied all
efforts to hook it up to a plain old PC.
I even have an extended keyboard, XT
only, sad to say, that was made by Key Tronics, that is rock-solid
(though the clickless keys are as squishy and unsatisfying as any in
the genre) and that, according to the box, once cost someone more
than $400.
My idea of a perfect keyboard is one
that feels and sounds like that of an IBM Selectric typewriter. (For
newcomers, a typewriter was a thing that connected keyboard directly
to paper, and all you got out of it was characters on paper. They
were very popular a couple of decades ago.) The Selectric vibrated
and shook with what must have been about a 20-horsepower motor. Then,
when you hit one of the keys, there was a satisfying THWACK as all of
its pent-up fury was released in a powerful display of ink reaching
paper. I want, but shall never have, a computer keyboard that so
obviously displays immense force. I have to settle for clickiness,
that phenomenon which leaves no doubt as to whether the key has been
pressed.
For a decade, the clicky keyboard by
which all others were measured was the Northgate Omnikey. It was made
by a company, Northgate, that built clones in the era before the
great hardware shakeout, when companies like Everex did battle with
the upstarts Dell and Gateway. The Northgate Omnikey was so popular
that the company sold it separately, and when the company went under
the major concern was what would happen to the keyboard business. We
could live without Northgate computers, but not without Northgate
keyboards.
The Omnikey had the greatest feel
imaginable. It also had, in its classic form, function keys to the
left of the main keyboard in two vertical rows, as The Almighty
intended. (A later version, the Omnikey Ultra, also had them across
the top, but these were programmable via software, and merely aped
the other function keys if you hadn't changed them.) Indeed, the
Omnikey was so prestigious that there was a special configuration
option for it in XF86Setup.
But Northgate is gone, and its
keyboards mostly so. From time to time some company will happen upon
a cache of them, and they get sold quickly. Those who have Omnikeys
maintain them very carefully, disassembling and cleaning them from
time to time. (Tip: If you can find one of those little cloth netting
drawstring bags that women and very strange men use to launder their
nylons, you can put your keycaps in one and put the bag in the top
rack of a dishwasher to restore them to just-like-new freshness; take
them out before the dry cycle begins.) Still, keyboards wear out, and
the switch most likely to cease to function first is one you use most
often -- the one under the spacebar, say, or the Enter key. Soon,
Northgate keyboards will be too rare and valuable to use.
I've been through three Omnikeys in
the last dozen years. My last one gave up the ghost a few months ago.
There is no supplier that I can find of new ones.
Since that time, I've been auditioning
keyboards. As I write this I'm literally surrounded by keyboards,
from old and solid ones that began life on an ancient Wang 286 (the
most beautifully built PC I've ever seen, by the way) and an old NEC
desktop, various broken Omnikeys (for click and springiness
comparison), and a selection of others new and old; I'll write,
though, mostly about the new ones.
Next: Bleak, But Not Hopeless »