.comment: On the Outlaw Trail with Linux
The Mainstream Is Good, Right?
What is it that causes some Linux users, myself included, a vague unease when talk turns to Linux moving into the mainstream? After all, there's no doubt that this would be a good thing, right?
I've tried to figure it out for a long time. Some things that appear to be clues are actually misleading. For instance, newbies posting to mailing lists or newsgroups are sometimes given the impression that they're not especially wanted, that if you weren't born with knowledge of Linux, you're out of luck; at least they're given a taste of "do your homework first." This in turn leads to accusations of "elitism," at which point any potential usefulness in the exchange is buried forever. There are, too, those who object to paying, ever, for software. Some have cobbled together a philosophical argument to support their position, while some just don't want to pay for software. Which is interesting, but it doesn't explain much.
A couple of incidents in the last week have provided what I think are better glimpses of the causes, or perhaps the effects, of the whole Linux, free-software, open-source movements. The first was when I dropped in at a nearby computer "superstore."
Solid state disks (SSDs) made a splash in consumer technology, and now the technology has its eyes on the enterprise storage market. Download this eBook to see what SSDs can do for your infrastructure and review the pros and cons of this potentially game-changing storage technology.
- 1Linux Top 3: RHEL 6.7, BackBox Linux 4.3 and RoboLinux 8.1
- 2Linux Top 3: SLES 11 SP4, Chromixium OS 1.5 and Canonical Licensing
- 3Linux Top 3: VirtualBox 5, Point Linux 3.0 and OpenSUSE Leap 42.x
- 4Linux Top 3: Linux 4.2 rc1, 4MLinux 13 and antiX15
- 5Linux Top 3: Linux Mint Rafaela, OpenMandriva Lx 2014.2 and VectorLinux 7.1