.comment: We're Getting There!
A Conspiracy of Circumstances

Dennis E. Powell
Wednesday, August 15, 2001 03:26:00 AM
Due to a work assignment, I had cause in the last few days to
install and take a look at Red Hat 7.1. I have by no means wrung
it out, though I plan to in the coming weeks and if I find
anything really remarkable I'll pass them along. And
I'll confess to a little bit of bias -- in some ways it
has very much seemed as if Red Hat has played the biggest
goldfish in the bowl, grabbing Linux and swimming into the little
castle to devour it without sharing, which bothers me. But
that's not the point for now.
My duties required that I install the whole thing, not some
predefined set of packages, accepting the defaults. The machine
is an FIC VA-503A motherboard with a K6-2-550 chip and 256 megs
of memory. The vid card is an OEM ATI Rage II with 32 megs. The
drive is a 10-gig vanilla IDE. The motherboard has the VIA Audio
Codec, which might more accurately be named That Damned VIA Audio
Codec. Or perhaps The Chip of Silence. I've never gotten
it to work with any distribution. I'm told it can be made
to work (and that it can be made to click and squeal, which is
not to me an improvement on silence), but the weekend when the
most important thing in the world is sorting it out has not yet
arrived. The network card is a cheapo Realtek 8139.
I've installed several other modern distributions on
this machine -- the Lab Rat -- in recent months, and the Red Hat
experience allows me to arrive at a conclusion: Linux
installation is all grown up. What used to be a hellish ordeal no
longer is.
My assignment came with Red Hat 7.1 CDs but no printed
documentation. None. Yeah, the docs are on the CDs, but my ad hoc rules for operating
system installation involve a blank machine and no recourse to
another machine to read the onboard docs. (And when you buy the
thing, it comes with docs. In this case, my rules might have been
a little too strict. Then again, I've installed Linux
before.)
I booted from the CD and was given a long set of choices
which timed out a little too quickly; fortunately, the default
graphical install was what I was after, because I wanted to see
the easiest installation. Soon I was greeted by something called
"Anaconda," which is too cute by half -- Caldera,
which pioneered the easy graphical install, called theirs
"Lizard." But the thing is good. The help text,
draped down the left of the screen, was useful. There was little
that anyone of average intelligence wouldn't
understand. There were exceptions -- the network setup
doesn't explain that if that network card is there just so
you can use, say, a cable modem, you don't really need to
fill in all those blanks. While I realize that Red Hat and most
everybody else seek the enterprise, a nicely worded paragraph
here would do much to ease the suffering of the would-be desktop
Linux user. The same holds true for drive partitioning and
formatting, and lilo configuration. In the former, the Disk Druid
program that Red Hat has used since Hector was a pup will not let
one assign the swap partition to hda1, which I do because I
always have. I do it now for consistency, even though the issue
of minimizing head movement might dictate putting it, say,
between /usr and /home, not that the swap partition typically
gets all that much use anyway. In the latter, there needs to be a
lot more explanation. Red Hat offers the "linear"
lilo parameter, but merely explains it by saying that it's
used if the system uses linear addressing. There is no BIOS
I've ever seen that employs the word
"linear." (And on this machine, a successful
install involved setting the BIOS to "normal,"
installing with "linear," then setting the BIOS to
"LBA." Nothing else took. But that could be
motherboard goofiness, so I'll not lay it at Red's
Hat.)
But other than those two things, which may well be addressed
in detail in the docs, the install was as easy as any I've
encountered. My video card was misidentified, but the choice the
install program made would have worked nicely. My monitor was
recognized, and setting up X was almost irritatingly easy --
these newbies will never know how we have wept over configuring
X. The USB trackball was recognized from the outset.This is part
of a trend, I think -- and it belies distributions’
concentration on the enterprise, because an administrator
doesn't need these niceties. Other distributions have been
likewise making Linux installation as painless as possible.
In due course I was booted to the Gnome desktop. As a
longtime KDE user, and an unashamed admirer of that desktop, I
found nothing that was sufficiently unusual or different that I
couldn't do work at once -- such as writing this column. I
do wonder what the point is, because I think KDE is far ahead of
Gnome development and otherwise the two are in all important ways
virtual clones, but I find nothing particularly objectionable
about Gnome, and even if I don't understand its
adherents’ reasoning, I think it's fine it's
there for them. What's more, it's not something
that would horrify the new Linux user. And the competition is
good for everybody, even though one would not guess this right
off the bat when encountering the flame wars that erupt following
all mentions of the two major desktops in the same paragraph
(probably including this one).
Next: Another Conspiracy of Circumstances »