.comment: A Different View of Security
Waking Up to a Changed World

Dennis E. Powell
Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:39:33 AM
It's been a week and a day since the world changed -- and believe
me, the world did change, all of it -- and it's ever more
evident that the rage is not going to go away. Possibly on either
side. Definitely not around here. I was in broadcasting in New York
City for a number of years, and a lot of the broadcast transmitters
and network uplinks were on top of the World Trade Center. There were
engineers there, and in broadcasting, one tends to know a lot of the
engineers. They didn't have a chance, nor did anyone located above the
points where the stolen airliners full of people hit. Officially
listed as "missing," they were either incinerated, or
crushed, or were among those who jumped, perhaps surprised at first
that there didn't seem to be a ground rush; that came a few seconds
later.
My country has been raped, and like other rape victims
we will recover, but we'll never be the same; still, we'll feel a lot
better when certain parts are lopped off the offenders -- in this
case, their heads. (If you disagree with me on this, tough.)
Some of the rage arises, no doubt, from an inability to do
anything about it. But for the IT community, there is a great deal
that must be done, anticipated, provided for.
Data Integrity and Preservation
As cold as this probably sounds, one of the disasters that
didn't take place last Tuesday was the loss of significant
data. And that's important. Many of the companies in the World Trade
Center were securities dealers, including some of the world's
largest. Had customer order information, account information,
inventories of customer securities held by the company, and other
important data not been duplicated off-site, a very bad economic
situation would have been made immeasurably worse.
I do not know of anyone, including those in a position to provide
a reliable appraisal, who thinks that the events of September 11 are
the last of it. They may be the last attack via commercial airliner,
but there are ever so many other ways of creating enormous death and
destruction in an open society. Already, people who have phony
documents have been arrested doing things such as scoping out dams
located above cities. There has been talk, even, of terrorist nuclear
weapons (the subject, interestingly, of John McPhee's The Curve of
Binding Energy, the tremendous 1974 book that speculated,
ironically, on using such a device to knock down the World Trade
Center). These produce, in addition to the obvious destruction, a very
nasty electromagnetic pulse against which most computers are nowhere
near hardened, and the range of the EMP can be significantly greater
than the area of physical damage. It is therefore extremely good
sense, if you are in a business where preservation of data is
extremely important, to back up to a distant and safe site. (This kind
of decentralization was, of course, one of the reasons for the
development of DARPAnet more than 30 years ago.)
Cyber Threats
After all that has happened, the appearance yesterday of yet
another Microsoft IIS worm was almost funny, illustrating as it did
something that would have been a huge outrage 10 days ago and that now
seemed almost insignificant. (Additionally, anyone who still runs
unpatched Windows boxen is so dimwitted that it's surprising they have
enough working brain cells to sustain life.) The new worm appears to
have nothing to do with the attacks of terror and death, but that
doesn't mean that the potential for an orchestrated and sustained
cyber attack doesn't exist. Despite the fact that it has never
happened, it is possible to bring down the Internet. And just
as people learned the folly of entrusting all their savings to dotcom
investments, they would come to learn the folly of entrusting their
commerce to a network that at the moment isn't all that safe. In fact,
the bad guys learned this a few days ago, when a European cracker
busted open a machine run by radical Moslems and published the email
addresses he found there. So much for the fabled encryption brilliance
of these guys.
Which raises an issue I've talked about before: there is more to
computer crime than the script kiddie stunts, the release of virus and
worm code, and DDoS attacks. We now believe that the people
responsible for last week's attacks actually shorted equities that
would lose value as a result of the attacks, thereby making a great
deal of money. So we are not talking a lack of sophistication
here. Nor are we talking a single group that is interested in
acquiring anything on your machine that might be of value -- garden
variety criminals are very likely up to this, too.
What to do? Firewall everything, tightly. Don't send anything of
importance over non-secure connections. Really beat your system up in
an effort to find vulnerabilities, then fix them. Kill all
nonessential services, which for many will be all
services. (Distributions, bless 'em, have mostly now dropped their
practice of turning everything on by default. That's a good step, but
the rest of the path you need to take yourself.)
Next: Time for Some Serious Rethinking »