|
 |
Turbo Screen Sharing
Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional offers users the ability to have a more productive and engaging web conferencing experience while providing the IT department with a program that efficiently utilizes bandwidth and minimally impacts the infrastructure. Learn More!
»
Informal Learning: Extending the Impact of Enterprise Ideas and Information
Forward-thinking organizations are turning to enterprise learning in their quest to be better informed, better skilled, better supported at the point of need, and more competitive in their respective marketplaces. Learn More! »
Rapid E-Learning: Maturing Technology Brings Balance and Possibilities
Rapid e-learning addresses both time and cost issues by using technology tools to shift the dynamics of e-learning development. Learn why more skilled learning professionals use these tools and how you can get a solution to keep pace with your business demands. »
Delivering on the Promise of ELearning
This white paper defines the framework to launch e-learning as a set of teaching, training, and learning practices not bound by a specific technology platform or learning management system. It offers practical suggestions for creating digital learning experiences that engage learners by building interest and motivation and providing opportunities for active participation. »
|
 | |
Basics for Adopting Linux/Open Source
Changing Some Old Ideas

Brian Proffitt
Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:27:40 AM
Let's face it; the chances of all of us waking up tomorrow and finding
Microsoft Windows replaced by Linux on every machine in the world are
pretty much the same chance that the Chicago Cubs will win the World
Series: possible, but likely not going to happen in my lifetime.
The adoption of a new platform is not something that happens
overnight, especially in the corporate arena, where conservativism
often makes the decision to change a slow and complicated
process. There are shades of grey wrapped up in every decision--quite
a contrast to the often black-and-white world of an IT worker. In that
world, if something is broken, fix it. If it breaks repeatedly,
re-code it (if you can) or replace it.
These different approaches are probably the major issue behind getting
corporations to look at Linux and other open source software
seriously. It is not that they have a great love affair with
Microsoft's products, but rather the fact that for decision-makers,
Windows, for all its flaws and expense, represents that which is
known. Linux represents the unknown and no amount of cajoling and
endorsement from the IT staff is going to change their
minds. Especially if the pro-Linux arguments are couched in technical
jargonism that seems like a foreign language.
The successful approach to endorsing Linux use in a company is to make
the case in terms that the decision-makers and purse-holders will
understand, i.e., financial benefits.
The standard approach to presenting this kind of information. is digging through the Internet and pulling out as many Total
Cost of Ownership (TCO) studies that you can find and present them as
evidence, making sure to contrast them with the upcoming Software
Assurance licensing changes that will take effect for Microsoft
applications.
This paper version of "Scared Straight" may shake the
managers out of their Microsoft comfort zone (if it hasn't already)
and make them more receptive to listening to alternative ideas, but
don't expect it to do all the work for you. You may want to suggest trying a test bed solution for Linux/OSS adoption with one team or department in your company first, so the real benefits can be seen with managements' own eyes.
There are more systematic methods that can be used in implementing a
platform adoption in an organization, methods that have been tried and
true by many consultants and managers. You can use them yourself to try to get Linux into your company.
Next: Starting Change »