Evaluating Mozilla 1.0 Candidate 1 - page 2
Evaluating A Mozilla Beta Release
The hardware used for the evaluation was a typical 3 year-old PII 300 MHz. clone laptop. It has 128 Mb of memory, a 4 Gb drive, CD and 14.1 inch XGA screen. The ESS 1968 audio chip handles the sounds and Trident 9397 video chip with 4 Mb video memory handles the graphics. The laptop has a 3Com 3CXFE575B PCMCIA 10/100 ethernet card. My testing was done connected to Road Runner residential cable service.
The laptop had SuSE Linux 7.3 Professional (2.4.10 Kernel) running in a 2.1 Gb partition. I had about 100 Mb of swap and two other DOS partitions of 1.2 GB and 600 Mb. This combination requires fairly lightweight applications, so for window managers, I typically run FVWM or ICEWM. FVWM loaded as the default window manager (since I didn't choose KDE or GNOME) under SuSE Linux.
Mozilla version 1.0 Candidate 1 was downloaded from the Mozilla ftp site at ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.0rc1/. It was in tar/gz format and was very easy to install. A window appeared that lets you choose from a basic browser up through a full install with mail, irc, etc. I chose the full install option. Only default settings were used.
Opera version 6.0 Beta 2 was downloaded from the Opera download page. I chose the dynamically linked release in RPM format. Again, loading was not a hassle and I just used all the default settings. It was the free version so the Opera advertisement was in the upper right corner.
Solid state disks (SSDs) made a splash in consumer technology, and now the technology has its eyes on the enterprise storage market. Download this eBook to see what SSDs can do for your infrastructure and review the pros and cons of this potentially game-changing storage technology.